October 18, 2023 – In a developing story filled with contention and defiance, the indigenous land and water defenders of Mainland Port au Port stand their ground against World Energy GH2’s green hydrogen project. Earlier this year, the conflict reached a boiling point when the company sought a court injunction against the protesters, citing severe disruptions to their wind testing sites. The recent courtroom drama surrounding Justice George Murphy’s potential bias has added another layer of complexity to this escalating conflict.
A Recap of the Injunction and Resistance
In a decisive move to protect its interests, World Energy GH2 filed an application at Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court earlier this year, following blockades that, according to Sean Leet, CEO of World Energy GH2, threatened the project’s viability. Justice George Murphy granted the interim order, but this legal action did little to quell the resolve of the protesters.
Sheila Hinks, a prominent figure among the defenders, expressed their collective determination. “I guess they’re going to take me to jail,” she said defiantly. “Because I’m not giving up this fight. This group of people behind me are not giving up this fight.”
The protesters’ grievances extend beyond the immediate environmental concerns, deeply rooted in the preservation of their indigenous rights, cultural heritage, and protection of natural resources. They argue that the windmills pose a threat to their supplemental water supply and overall wellbeing.
Economic Strains and Legal Struggles
World Energy GH2 has been candid about the financial strain the protests have inflicted, claiming losses over $500,000, along with equipment damage and project delays. The company emphasized the critical nature of immediate resumption of operations, underlying the project’s fragile standing.
Despite these pressures, the indigenous defenders remain undeterred, their recent legal challenge being a testament to their sustained commitment to this cause.
Murphy’s Impartiality Questioned
The situation took a complicated turn during the latest hearings. The defense questioned Justice Murphy’s impartiality, bringing to light his past connections with billionaire John Risley and discrepancies in his courtroom conduct. While Murphy recalls his 2007 visit to Risley’s lodge, he displayed concerning gaps in memory regarding previous remarks made during the trial’s proceedings.
Murphy’s decision to withhold his judgment on recusal for three weeks has been met with criticism, as has the tight schedule imposed on the indigenous defendants, further straining their resources and capacity to respond to new evidence.
A Community’s Plea for Support
As the case garners attention, calls for public support amplify. The indigenous community, local supporters, and environmental activists worldwide mark the dates February 21 and 22, 2024, recognizing the significant impact this case will have on indigenous rights and environmental justice.
The ongoing struggle in Mainland Port au Port is emblematic of global indigenous resistance against industrial giants. The outcome could set a significant precedent for how corporations and the legal system address indigenous rights and environmental stewardship in the future.
-30-